arXiv / 2016

Learning Interpretable Musical Compositional Rules and Traces

Haizi Yu, Lav R. Varshney, Guy E. Garnett, Ranjitha Kumar

Foundation ModelsInterpretabilityLarge Language ModelsPopular and Landmark Papers

Throughout music history, theorists have identified and documented interpretable rules that capture the decisions of composers. This paper asks, "Can a machine behave like a music theorist?" It presents MUS-ROVER, a self-learning system for automatically discovering rules from symbolic music. MUS-ROVER performs feature learning via $n$-gram models to extract compositional rules --- statistical patterns over the resulting features. We evaluate MUS-ROVER on Bach's (SATB) chorales, demonstrating that it can recover known rules, as well as identify new, characteristic patterns for further study. We discuss how the extracted rules can be used in both machine and human composition.

0 citations0 influential

Full paper

Read the original paper

Open PDF Source page

Learning resources

arXiv PDFPDF arXiv abstract pagearXiv Google Scholar referencesGoogle Scholar Papers with Code searchPapers with Code YouTube explanationsYouTube

Reading state

Discuss in ChatGPT

Uses your own ChatGPT account. The paper context is copied into a tutor prompt before ChatGPT opens.

Preview prompt

You are my AI/ML research paper instructor. I want to deeply understand the paper below.

First, teach it in layers:
1. One-paragraph intuition.
2. Problem statement and why it mattered.
3. Key method, architecture, or algorithm.
4. Important equations or mechanisms, explained intuitively.
5. Experiments and evidence.
6. Limitations, assumptions, and failure modes.
7. How this paper influenced later AI/ML/Deep Learning/GenAI work.
8. A 30-minute study plan with checkpoints.
9. Quiz me with 5 questions and wait for my answers.

When something is not available in the attached context, say what is missing and infer carefully.

### Paper attached as context
Title: Learning Interpretable Musical Compositional Rules and Traces
Authors: Haizi Yu, Lav R. Varshney, Guy E. Garnett, Ranjitha Kumar
Year: 2016
Venue: arXiv
Categories: Foundation Models, Interpretability, Large Language Models, Popular and Landmark Papers
Citations: 0
Paper URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.05572v1
Open PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1606.05572v1

Abstract:
Throughout music history, theorists have identified and documented interpretable rules that capture the decisions of composers. This paper asks, "Can a machine behave like a music theorist?" It presents MUS-ROVER, a self-learning system for automatically discovering rules from symbolic music. MUS-ROVER performs feature learning via $n$-gram models to extract compositional rules --- statistical patterns over the resulting features. We evaluate MUS-ROVER on Bach's (SATB) chorales, demonstrating that it can recover known rules, as well as identify new, characteristic patterns for further study. We discuss how the extracted rules can be used in both machine and human composition.

Learning resources:
- PDF: arXiv PDF (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1606.05572v1)
- arXiv: arXiv abstract page (https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.05572v1)
- Google Scholar: Google Scholar references (https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Learning%20Interpretable%20Musical%20Compositional%20Rules%20and%20Traces)
- Papers with Code: Papers with Code search (https://paperswithcode.com/search?q=Learning%20Interpretable%20Musical%20Compositional%20Rules%20and%20Traces)
- YouTube: YouTube explanations (https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Learning%20Interpretable%20Musical%20Compositional%20Rules%20and%20Traces+paper+explained)